Legal Cyber Crime Queries

showing 1-9 of 9 first | <> | next > | last

(manage) May 13 Legal Cyber Crime Queries Here u can ask any question related to cyber crime there effect and ill effects in india. e.g. Q. You can ask like If a website is hacked what legal action can u take against that hacker. We have a legal lawyer to ans your queries. delete ᠌ (manage) May 13 INDIAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000 SEC 65 TEMPERING WITH COMPUTER SOURCE CODE IMPRISONMENT UPTO 3 Yrs OR WITH FINE UPTO Rs. 200,000 OR BOTH SEC 66(2) HACKING WITH COMPUTER SYSTEM IMPRISONMENT UPTO 3 Yrs WITH A FINE UPTO Rs. 200,000 OR WITH BOTH SEC 67 PUBLISHING OR TRANSMITTING OBSCENE MATERIAL IN ELECTRONIC FORM IMPRISONMENT UPTO 5 Yrs AND FINE UPTO Rs. 100,000 FOR FIRST CONVICTION//////\\\\\\\ IMPRISONMENT UPTO 10 Yrs. AND FINE UPTO Rs. 200,000 FOR SECOND SUBSEQUENT CONVICTION. SEC 71 BREACHING CONFIDENTIALITY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT TO WHICH A PERSON HAS ACCESS IMPRISONMENT UPTO 2 Yrs OR WITH FINE UPTO Rs. 100,000 OR WITH BOTH delete ᠌ (manage) May 13 WHOEVER KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY TEMPERS WITH THE COMPUTER SOURCE DOCUMENTS WOULD BE LIABLE FOR A PUNISHMENT WITH IMPRISONMENT UPTO THREE YEARS OR WITH A FINE, WHICH MAY EXTEND TO TWO LAKH Rs. OR WITH BOTH : SEC 65 SEC 66 DEALS WITH THE HACKING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS WHICH IS CONSIDERED TO BE A CRIME IF COMMITTED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER : . WITH INTENTION TO CAUSE OR KNOWING THAT SUCH HACKING IS LIKELY TO CAUSE WRONGFUL DAMAGE OR LOSS TO THE PUBLIC OR . ANY PERSON WHO DESTROYS OR DELETES OR ALTERS ANY INFORMATION RESIDING IN A COMPUTER RESOURCE OR DIMINISHES ITS VALUE OR UTILITY OR AFFECTS IT INJURIOUSLY BY ANY MEANS, BY WAY OF HACKING. SUCH HACKING IS PUNISHABLE WITH IMPRISONMENT UPTO 3 Yrs. OR WITH A FINE WHICH MAY EXTEND UPTO 200,000 Rs. , OR WITH BOTH delete ᠌ (manage) May 13 THE DEFINATION OF HACKING UNDER SEC 66(1) OF THE I T ACT 2000 IS MUCH WIDER THAN THE INTERNATIONALLY ACCEPTED NOTION OF THE TERM. THE DRAFTING OF THE SAID SECTION BY THE LEGISLATURE IS LIKELY TO MAKE SEC 66 THE MOTHER SECTION OF ALL PROVISIONS OF I T ACT. IN A VAST MAJORITY OF CASES, WHATEVER A PERSONDOES, WHETHER WITH INTENTION OR KNOWLEDGE OVER THE INTERNET OR IN THE ELECTRONIC MEDIUM IS LIKELY TO INVOKE, THE MISCHIEF OF SEC 66 OF THE I T ACT 2000. ALSO THE SAID SECTION PRESCRIBES WIDE RANGING OF CONCEPTS WITH NO PARAMETER AS TO HOW THE SAID CONCEPTS WOULD BE DULY PROVED IN A COURT OF LAW. FIRST ODF ALL, IT IS A TELL ORDER TO PROVEINTENTION TO CAUSE WRONGFUL LOSS OR DAMAGE IN THE ELECTRONIC ENVIRONMENT AND INTERNET. THE WORD “WRONGFUL LOSS” IS NOT DEFINED UNDER THE IT ACT. HOWEVER , SEC 23 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE DEFINES “WRONGFUL LOSS” TO MEAN “LOSS BY UNLAWFUL MEANS OF PROPERTY TO WHICH THE PERSON LOSING IT IS LEGALLY ENTITLED.” AT A TIMEWHEN CYBER LAW IS DEVELOPING THERE ARE NUMEROUSGREY AREAS AND IN MANY INSTANCES THE CONCEPT OF LEGAL ENTITLEMENT IS NOT YET CLEAR. FURTHER, HOW DO YOU PROVE THE DIMINISHING OF VALUE OF INFORMATION? THE VALUE OF INFORMATION IS INHERENT IN THE INFORMATION ITSELF. FURTHER THE VALUE OF INFORMATION IS LIKELY TO DIFFER FROM CONTEXT TO CONTEXT AND FROM PERSPECTIVE TO PERSPECTIVE. FURTHER THERE WILL BE GREAT IMPEDIMENTS TO PROVE DIMINISHING OF UTILITY OF INFORMATION. NO STANDARD FOR PROVING THE SAME AS PER LAW HAVE YET BEEN LAID DOWN. ALSO HOW WILL YOU PROVE THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN AFFECTED INJURIOUSLY BY ANY MEAN? WHAT ARE THE NORMS & STANDARDS FOR PROVING INJURY IN THE ELECTRONIC MEDIUM & INTERNET? SIGNED By : •Я:Е GøЃÅTHË® delete MR. Nobody (manage) May 13 abv lines are like a horror movie delete [mexer]‮ㅤ‮ (manage) May 13 arre godfather ji....itna mat darao i am planning to hack my college lan to fetch the question paper delete ᠌ (manage) May 13 Hello Frnds PLz. No chat here only queries Dont worry Its very difficult to prove hacking SIGNED By : •Я:Е GøЃÅTHË® delete Voting machine (manage) May 15(6 days ago) Godfather.. can i ask ya a question pleasE? delete ᠌ (manage) May 18(3 days ago) OK ask SIGNED By : •Я:Е GøЃÅTHË® delete

showing 1-9 of 9